Something's not right here. One year after the great collapse of our financial system, Wall Street is back on top while our politicians dither. As for health care reform, you're about to be forced to buy insurance from companies whose stock is soaring, and that's just dandy with the White House.
Truth is, our capitol's being looted, republicans are acting like the town rowdies, the sheriff is firing blanks, and powerful Democrats in Congress are in cahoots with the gang that's pulling the heist. This is not capitalism at work. It's capital. Raw money, mounds of it, buying politicians and policy as if they were futures on the hog market.
Here to talk about all this are two journalists who don't pull their punches. Robert Kuttner is an economist who helped create and now co-edits the progressive magazine THE AMERICAN PROSPECT, and the author of the book OBAMA'S CHALLENGE, among others.
Also with me is Matt Taibbi, who covers politics for ROLLING STONE magazine where he is a contributing editor. He's made a name for himself writing in a no-holds-barred, often profane, but always informative and stimulating style that gets under the skin of the powerful. His most recent article is "Obama's Big Sellout," about the President's team of economic advisers and their Wall Street connections. It's been burning up the blogosphere. Welcome to both of you.
BILL MOYERS: Let's start with some news. Some of the big insurance companies, Well Point, Cigna, United Health, all surged to a 52 week high in their share prices this week when it was clear there'd be no public option in the health care bill going through Congress right now. What does that tell you, Matt?
MATT TAIBBI: Well, I think what most people should take away from this is that the massive subsidies for health insurance companies have been preserved while it's also expanded their customer base because there's an individual mandate in the bill that's going to provide all these companies with the, you know, 25 or 30 million new people who are going to be paying for health insurance. So, it's, obviously, a huge boon to that industry. And I think Wall Street correctly read what the health care effort is all about.
ROBERT KUTTNER: Rahm Emanuel, the President's Chief of Staff, was Bill Clinton's Political Director. And Rahm Emanuel's take away from Bill Clinton's failure to get health insurance passed was 'don't get on the wrong side of the insurance companies.' So their strategy was cut a deal with the insurance companies, the drug industry going in. And the deal was, we're not going to attack your customer base, we're going to subsidize a new customer base. And that script was pre-cooked so it's not surprising that this is what comes out the other side.
BILL MOYERS: So are you saying that this, what some call a sweetheart deal between the pharmaceutical industry and the White House, done many months ago before this fight really began, was because the drug company money in the Democratic Party?
ROBERT KUTTNER: Well, it's two things. Part of it was we need to do whatever it takes to get a bill. Never mind whether it's a really good bill, let's get a bill passed so we can claim that we solved health insurance. Secondly, let's get the drug industry and the insurance industry either supporting us or not actively opposing us. So that there was some skirmishing around the details, but the deal going in was that the administration, drug companies, insurance companies are on the same team. Now, that's one way to get legislation, it's not a way to transform the health system. Once the White House made this deal with the insurance companies, the public option was never going to be anything more than a fig leaf. And over the summer and the fall, it got whittled down, whittled down, whittled down to almost nothing and now it's really nothing.
MATT TAIBBI: Yeah, and this was Howard Dean's point this week was that this individual mandate that's going to force people to become customers of private health insurance companies, the Democrats are going to end up owning that policy and it's going to be extremely unpopular and it's going to be theirs for a generation. It's going to be an albatross around the neck of this party.
ROBERT KUTTNER: Think about it, the difference between social insurance and an individual mandate is this. Social insurance everybody pays for it through their taxes, so you don't think of Social Security as a compulsory individual mandate. You think of it as a benefit, as a protection that your government provides.
Obama's BIGGER Sellout...
|
Posted By: adam Posted on: Dec. 28, 2009 at 10:55 AM |
1.0 / 5
Based on 1 ratings.
|
But an individual mandate is an order to you to go out and buy some product from some private profit-making company, that in the case of a lot of moderate income people, you can't afford to buy. And the shell game here is that the affordable policies are either very high deductibles and co-pays, so you can afford the monthly premiums but then when you get sick, you have to pay a small fortune out of pocket before the coverage kicks in. Or if the coverage is decent, the premiums are unaffordable. And so here's the government doing the bidding of the private industry coercing people to buy profit-making products that maybe they can't afford and they call it health reform.
Comments:
|
Dec. 30, 2009 at 07:23:46 AM
|
||
| You did realize the great warrior against corporatism, Bill Moyers, made a fortune selling recordings of his tax subsidized PBS show without paying a dime to PBS. Profit is bad when evil "Corporations" make it but Moyers shows no hesitation to steal PBS's tax subsidized intellectual property. This bozo is telling you what you want to hear Adam, while he is laughing all the way to the bank. That's hardly a person to rely on for information. I am curious if the so-called expert Kuttner has bothered to look at the woeful financial condition of Social Security? Evidently not else he would not advocate trashing healthcare along the same lines. The other possibility is he knows SS is a failure but chooses to gloss over it to advance the radical Left's agenda; don't worry it will work this time with the right people (like me) in charge. Typical Progryssve ignore their policy failures while fighting even timid attempts at true reform like Bush attempted, then champion another government takover. |
||
|
Dec. 30, 2009 at 09:27:24 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by AZRWinger on Dec. 30, 2009 at 07:23:46 AM]
AZRWinger
Dec. 30, 2009 at 07:23:46 AM You did realize the great warrior against corporatism, Bill Moyers, made a fortune selling recordings of his tax subsidized PBS show without paying a dime to PBS. Profit is bad when evil make it but Moyers shows no hesitation to steal PBS's tax... View this Comment I see you want to play the same game as phake..... I dont oppose Corporations or profit, I am a free market kind of guy.... I OPPOSE Corporatism.... If your corporaton wants to COMPETE in the open market and make money, that is what makes this country great.... But if your corporaton wants to control and influence the market WITH GOVERNMENT to give you advantage over your competititors, then that is the core of Nazi Fascism and TYRANNY.... Corporatism. Well IF Moyers is giving INCORRECT informaton, then WHY NOT JUST DISPUTE IT? Morally, WHY would YOU let him go on......spredding LIES, IF that is what you are claiming.... INSTEAD of JUST making HOLLOW accusations? WHY use the SAME argument as June, nic, and phake? WHY not debate what he is saying INTELLECTUALLY insead of using FASCISTIC propaganda to TRY and EMOTIONALLY MARGINALIZE hm and his message.... I suspect lke June, nic and phake................this is just the best you'YOUR ideology has prepared you for.... |
||
|
Dec. 30, 2009 at 09:41:55 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by AZ Moderate on Dec. 29, 2009 at 09:46:10 PM]
AZ Moderate
Dec. 29, 2009 at 09:46:10 PM I have ta tell ya, my head is spinning over this. Seems like a huge betrayal on the surface of it. And it is absolutely mind boggling that it is so obvious, so in-your-face arrogant and dismissive of the Average American. ... View this Comment AZ Mod, It is very clear the DAMAGE that Bill Clinton did.... Giving Corporatism MORE and MORE POWER.... You have written EXTENSIVELY about this Obama CAMPAIGNED outside the PARTY, but as SOON AS HE WAS ELECTED, he filled his administration with the SAME PARTY PEOPLE that Clinton had.... AZ Mod, it is THE PARTY, and its CORRUPTION of Government that IS the issue and the CORE of the PROBLEM.... And it does not matter IF it is the Red TEAM of the PARTY or the Blue TEAM of the PARTY
The Red TEAM/Blue TEAM GAME is mearly a distraction..... |
||
|
Dec. 31, 2009 at 06:45:26 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by adam on Dec. 30, 2009 at 09:27:24 AM]
adam
Dec. 30, 2009 at 09:27:24 AM I see you want to play the same game as phake..... I dont oppose Corporations or profit, I am a free market kind of guy.... I OPPOSE Corporatism.... If your corporaton wants to COMPETE in the open market and make money, that is what makes... View this Comment I am not making "hollow accusations" about Bill Moyers Adam, I am providing you with context in which to realistically evaluate his supposed anti-capitalism. You claim you are for free markets yet proffer up someone who cashed in on his tax subsidized prominence for personal gain. Isn't it important to understand Moyer's advocacy of destroying "corporatism" is really just a facade for more State control as show by his exploitation of so-called public broadcasting for personal profit? The State rather than free market competition becomes the primary determinant of success, classic national socialism, in the Progryssve world view. At the highest level, I agree with Moyer's and company, we ought to scrap Obamacare and start over. We will quickly diverge approaches when we begin discussing what ought to take its place. The radical Progryssve will only be satisfied with the complete "socialization" of your medical care. In contrast, Conservatives advocate creating more competition by opening markets, individual health savings accounts, tort reform and equitable tax treatment for individuals purchasing health insurance. Such is the nature of politics that Progryssves and Conservatives can join together in opposition to a colossally wrong bit of legislation. Adam, you are fond of claiming there is not difference between the Red and Blue teams. But, which "team" in Congress cast their votes in opposition to Obamacare? BTW Walter Williams is sitting in for Rush today. If you have the opportunity you should check him out. You can also read his columns in Townhall.com. |
||
|
Dec. 31, 2009 at 07:30:34 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by AZRWinger on Dec. 31, 2009 at 06:45:26 AM]
AZRWinger
Dec. 31, 2009 at 06:45:26 AM I am not making "hollow accusations" about Bill Moyers Adam, I am providing you with context in which to realistically evaluate his supposed anti-capitalism. You claim you are for free markets yet proffer up someone who cashed in on his... View this Comment AZR says: I am not making "hollow accusations" about Bill Moyers Adam, I am providing you with context in which to realistically evaluate his supposed anti-capitalism. Yes, of course I know about PBS. "Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people" - John Adams - Second President - 1797 - 1801"
Well then SHOW the context and DEMONSTRATE his "supposed' anti-capitalizm.... And you have YET to present any COUNTERING EVIDENCE to anything he has presented.. AGAIN, you are just trying to marginalize him and his message, typcally Propaganda 101, just like the rest of the lil fascists here. If you have FACTS, DATA and INFORMATION that what he is presenting is untrue, HOW can you let him go unchallanged?
It is not that Obamascare should just be scrapped, it was ONLY needed to because PREVIOUS legislaton like HMO and HIPAA already FAVORED the BIG CORPORTISTS... This is to INSURANCE and BIG PHARMA what the Financial Services Act was for BANKING..... AZR says: Adam, you are fond of claiming there is not difference between the Red and Blue teams. But, which "team" in Congress cast their votes in opposition to Obamacare? So NOW, you want to tell me that the Red TEAM is not run by the PARTY and is not corrupt from Corporatists? Be real, and stop pretenting to be lil Junie..... Sorry, but am not STUPID enough to have forgotten already... But BOTH TEAMs have already sold out to the PARTY and FAIL to represent the CONSTITUTON and the Citizenry....
You know that the REAL danger of Obamascare is what the Red TEAM will do for their Corporatist's buddies when they regain Control of Congress and the White House...
|
||
|
Dec. 31, 2009 at 08:50:22 AM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by AZRWinger on Dec. 31, 2009 at 06:45:26 AM]
AZRWinger
Dec. 31, 2009 at 06:45:26 AM I am not making "hollow accusations" about Bill Moyers Adam, I am providing you with context in which to realistically evaluate his supposed anti-capitalism. You claim you are for free markets yet proffer up someone who cashed in on his... View this Comment BTW Walter Williams is sitting in for Rush today Born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Dr. Walter E. Williams holds a B.A. in economics from California State University, Los Angeles, and M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in economics from UCLA. He also holds a Doctor of Humane Letters from Virginia Union University and Grove City College, Doctor of Laws from Washington and Jefferson College and Doctor Honoris Causa en Ciencias Sociales from Universidad Francisco Marroquin, in Guatemala, where he is also Professor Honorario./span> Dr. Williams has served on the faculty of George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, as John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics, since 1980; from 1995 to 2001, he served as department chairman. He has also served on the faculties of Los Angeles City College, California State University Los Angeles, and Temple University in Philadelphia, and Grove City College, Grove City, Pa.
So YOU "proffer up someone who cashed in on his tax subsidized prominence for personal gain"? Why does that disquality Moyer and quality Williams? /span> |
||
|
Jan. 1, 2010 at 12:22:11 PM
|
||
[This is a reply to comment by AZRWinger on Dec. 31, 2009 at 06:45:26 AM]
AZRWinger
Dec. 31, 2009 at 06:45:26 AM I am not making "hollow accusations" about Bill Moyers Adam, I am providing you with context in which to realistically evaluate his supposed anti-capitalism. You claim you are for free markets yet proffer up someone who cashed in on his... View this Comment So YOU "proffer up someone who cashed in on his tax subsidized prominence for personal gain"? Why does that disquality Moyer and quality Williams? |
||
|
Jan. 3, 2010 at 07:33:26 AM
|
||
| Why they HATE US......for IDIOTS... Record US aid goes on armaments ANNE DAVIES, WASHINGTON January 1, 2010 JUST before Christmas, US President Barack Obama signed into law one of his country's biggest aid pledges of the year. It was bound not for Africa or any of the many struggling countries on the World Bank's list. It was a 10-year deal for $US2.77 billion ($A3.1 billion) to go to Israel in 2010 and a total of $US30 billion over the next decade, mainly to be spent on US military hardware. Despite the serious financial crisis in the US economy, the US is proceeding with its increased aid package to Israel. Israel is bound by the agreement to use 75 per cent of the aid to buy military devices made in the US — and in a recession, those military factories are critical to many towns. ... According to work done by the Congressional Research Service, the US spent 17 per cent of the total US aid budget — or $US5.1 billion — on military aid in 2008, of which $US4.7 billion was grants to enable governments to receive equipment from the US |
||
|
Jan. 3, 2010 at 02:17:49 PM
|
Rating for this article
|
|
[This is a reply to comment by adam on Jan. 3, 2010 at 07:33:26 AM]
adam
Jan. 3, 2010 at 07:33:26 AM Why they HATE US......for IDIOTS... Record US aid goes on armaments ANNE DAVIES, WASHINGTON January 1, 2010 JUST before Christmas, US President Barack Obama signed into law one of his country's biggest aid pledges of the year. It was... View this Comment Spinning?
|
||







del.icio.us
Digg It!


I have ta tell ya, my head is spinning over this. Seems like a huge betrayal on the surface of it. And it is absolutely mind boggling that it is so obvious, so in-your-face arrogant and dismissive of the Average American. /span>
/span>
But what do I know. I’m just one of those disdained Average Americans that is presumed to be so ignorant that I won’t notice – or if I do it won’t matter!/span>
Report Abuse